A growing number of top prominent scientists...
... say more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere does not cause global warming. In fact they claim the opposite: warmer weather causes the world’s oceans to release more natural CO2 into the atmosphere with marginal influence from man.
This opposes the UN climate body, the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). The opposing scientists are not eccentrics but recognised experts in their relevant disciplines, neglected - or not sufficiently noticed - by the IPCC. Since 1988, the IPCC claims to have engaged 2,500 scientists over a period of 20 years in creating faux main scenarios. But far from all have taken part at the same time or even on the same issues.
Many who have been involved in IPCC work have taken opposite stands or left the IPCC completely. There is no body of 2,500 unanimous scientists behind the IPCC.
The four IPCC scenarios are based on selected chosen reports to prove that humans heat the atmosphere. Contradictory reports were disregarded and final reports were written, not by scientists, but by politicians and bureaucrats. Their scientific base is an apparent similarity between average earth surface temperatures and CO2 emissions over the period 1850-1998. But they give no evidence of the natural processes in the atmosphere, the oceans and other factors behind this.
Recent scientific observations give other connections and explanations:
- Water vapour is the dominant greenhouse gas.
- Warmer oceans emit an increased amount of CO2.
- Man’s CO2 emissions account for only 2 per cent of CO2 exchanged between oceans, vegetation and atmosphere.
- Reduced solar activity emits more cosmic radiation, creating more clouds in the atmosphere.
As CO2 in itself is harmless to life on earth and is positively beneficial and necessary for photosynthesis, it seems we should stop worrying about it and try to reduce toxic and dangerous emissions instead.
Original article by Tege Tornvall, Leksand, Sweden