The UN – A History Of War On Israel
The United Nations war on Israel has never been on the back burner, and its feeding frenzy over Gaza is no exception. The Security Council has now held four sessions. The General Assembly has scheduled an emergency session for Thursday night (8th January), and on Friday (9th January), the UN's lead human rights body, the Human Rights Council, will hold a special session to damn Israel.
An Historical Perspective – The UN and Israel
To put this in perspective, the Security Council is the UN's lead response to terrorism. After 9/11, the Security Council started convening as "the Counter-Terrorism Committee" or CTC.
The CTC has never identified a single terrorist, terrorist organization or state sponsor of terrorism - because the Islamic chokehold on the UN leaves it without a definition of terrorism to this day.
The General Assembly has had 10 emergency sessions in its history. Six of those, including the 10th, have been on Israel, and the tenth has been "reconvened" 16 times since 1997. In other words, there is a permanent General Assembly emergency session on Israel. The same Assembly never managed to hold a single emergency session on the 800,000 people who died in the Rwandan genocide, or the 3 million who are dead or displaced in Sudan.
As for the "reformed" Human Rights Council, it is now holding its fifth special session on Israel. By comparison, the Council has held nine regular sessions on human rights in all of the other 191 UN states. In fact, over its two and a half-year history, the Council has condemned Israel more often than all other states in the United Nations combined.
It is hardly surprising, therefore, that since Israel finally decided to defend itself against the 8,000 rockets and mortar shells directed at its civilian population over eight years, the long UN knives have been quickly drawn. In addition to all the meetings, which are now webcast for propaganda purposes around the world, UN officials have used their global platforms to vilify the Jewish state and to try to tie Israel's hands behind its back. In one form or another, UN officials always manage to choke on the word "self-defence."
Israel-bashing – Part of the UN Guru’s Job Description
From out of the woodwork come UN gurus from the myriad UN bodies which have Israel-bashing as part of their job description:
- Richard Falk, UN Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in the Palestinian Territories Occupied Since 1967;
- Karen AbuZayd, Commission-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA);
- John Ging, UNRWA Director of Operations in Gaza;
- Maxwell Gaylard, United Special Coordinator in the Occupied Territories (UNSCO),
- Paul Badji and the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People;
- Robert Serry, Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process;
- Christine van Nieuwenhuyse, World Food Program Representative in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
Arab-funded UN Bias
Right alongside those folks for the past two weeks have been the UN "experts" and agencies whose well-being - their stature and internal authority, re-appointment, promotion, pension, operational funding and institutional perks of all kinds - depend on being on the Arab side of all Arab-Israeli conflicts.
These people include:
- the Secretary-General,
- the High Commissioner for Human Rights,
- the Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and UN Emergency Relief Coordinator;
- the UN Office of the Humanitarian Coordinator (OCHA);
- the UN Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict;
- the Chairperson of the Coordination Committee of Special Procedures;
- the Executive Director, UN Population Fund (UNFPA);
- and the Director-General, UNESCO.
Together all of these UN actors have mounted a feverish chorus alleging that Israel has committed "wanton aggression", "monstrosities", "massacres", and "crimes against humanity."
In each case humanized Palestinian victims are placed on one side of the scale, and a small number of Israeli deaths are set on the other. Evidently, the UN only started counting Israeli bodies last week. Left out of this phony "proportionality test" is the terror associated with every Hamas-driven attempt to cause more death and destruction.
And it is politically incorrect in the extreme to mention that the blameless Palestinians freely elected a terrorist group sworn to killing Jews.
Hamas’ Human Sacrifice
In short, Hamas has perfected a form of human sacrifice in the 21st century.
It launches rockets from schools, uses ambulances as transport, hides behind women and children, and wears civilian clothing as camouflage. Palestinian civilian casualties are the Palestinian leadership's weapon of choice.
The only body still allegedly oblivious to this grotesque calculation is the UN. Asked about Hamas' use of civilians as human shields, UNRWA chief, AbuZayd responded: "I don't know of these human shields being used... What I would say is that Hamas very much leave us alone; let me say, they respect us."
The UN cacophony is not what Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice had envisaged for her swan song. She hoped to exit with a Security Council resolution that she rammed through on December 16th, against Israel's wishes, praising her stillborn Annapolis initiative and bringing UN tentacles ever closer to their Israeli target by involving the Security Council more closely in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Today’s Situation
Which brings us to today's situation. Every anti-Israel idea out there has one major goal - whether it is propagated by France, Europe, Russia, Egypt, or the UN. They all want in on the Arab-Israeli conflict. Solutions subject to negotiations between the parties? Israeli control over its own borders? Not if any of these players can help it.
The drafts of UN presidential statements and resolutions now being floated include one key element. Wrest control from Israel and diminish Israeli sovereignty. The drafts insert international players via calls to "provide protection for civilian populations" or "establish and deploy an international observer force." Any such insertion of international actors will have only one result: to diminish the ability of Israel now and in the future to protect its citizens.
Israeli leaders must reject any formula that smacks of such a degradation of their inherent right to control their own destiny.
This article, by Anne Bayefsky, originally appeared in The New York Daily News.
Comments
from israel today magazine. I
from israel today magazine. I just enclose this to read Wednesday, September 23, 2009 WEEKEND SPECIAL Get them at Jerusalem Depot >> Netanyahu puts peace process back in proper perspective For decades the international community has let the Arabs define the Middle East peace process as the rectifying of wrongs done to the Palestinians by the Israelis. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sought to correct that error when he addressed the UN General Assembly on Thursday. In a brief but powerful speech, Netanyahu reminded the world that it was the ancient prophets of his people that once inhabited the Holy Land and whose words are today holy scripture for billions of people. "The Jewish people are not foreign conquerors in the Land of Israel. This is the land of our forefathers," declared Netanyahu. "Inscribed on the walls outside this building is the great Biblical vision of peace: 'Nation shall not lift up sword against nation. They shall learn war no more.' These words were spoken by the Jewish prophet Isaiah 2,800 years ago as he walked in my country, in my city - in the hills of Judea and in the streets of Jerusalem. We are not strangers to this land. It is our homeland." The Israeli leader said he is ready and willing make peace based on giving part of that land to the Palestinian Arabs who live there, but will not do so based on lies and false accusations against his people. In particular, Netanyahu said he wants the Palestinians to finally acknowledge Israel as a Jewish state, just as the UN itself did in 1947 when it divided the Holy Land between Jews and Arabs, a decision the Jews accepted but the Arabs rejected. "We ask the Palestinians to finally do what they have refused to do for 62 years: Say yes to a Jewish state." Netanyahu also devoted a large chunk of his speech to blasting the recent UN-mandated Goldstone Commission report, which accused Israel of committing war crimes in its invasion of the Gaza Strip earlier this year in response to years of Hamas rocket fire. The prime minister recalled how the world cheered when Israel withdrew from Gaza and promised to "back our right of self-defense" should anything go wrong, only to turn around and accuse Israel of the most heinous crimes when it was forced to defend itself. And that despite the fact that Israel went to extraordinary lengths to avoid Palestinian casualties, unlike the way self-righteous Western powers responded when one of their cities was rocketed decades earlier. "There is only one example in history of thousands of rockets being fired on a country's civilian population. It happened when the Nazis rocketed British cities during World War II," said Netanyahu, in a short history lesson. In response, "the Allies leveled German cities, causing hundreds of thousands of casualties." Netanyahu insisted that if Israel cannot count on fairness, even when is goes the extra mile to protect innocent lives on the other side, then it will find it increasingly difficult to take risks with its security in the name of peace. The bulk of Netanyahu's speech focused on Iran, and the Islamic Republic was even mentioned in those sections of the speech dealing with the peace process. Netanyahu said that without firmly dealing with existential regional threats, the international community could not reasonably hope to oversee a viable peace between Israel and its neighbors. He also strongly condemned the UN for providing a podium to Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad a day earlier, despite Iranian leader's repeated denial of the Nazi Holocaust and his open desire to destroy Israel. "Yesterday, the man who calls the Holocaust a lie spoke from this podium. To those who refused to come here and to those who left this room in protest, I commend you. You stood up for moral clarity and you brought honor to your countries," said Netanyahu. "But to those who gave this Holocaust-denier a hearing, I say on behalf of my people, the Jewish people, and decent people everywhere: Have you no shame? Have you no decency?" Netanyahu warned the international community that "history has shown us time and again that what starts with attacks on the Jews eventually ends up engulfing many others."
The current UN is a very
The current UN is a very different entity to the one that grew out of League of Nations The main aim then was to make sure nothing like WW2 ever happened again but in latter years it has been hijacked by countries with left wing/Islamist leanings & it very anti Israel.Dore Gold's briiliant book Tower of Babble is very enlightening on what the UN has become. Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East where Jewish & Arab citizens have equal rights so how can Toby call it "a state of apartheid"?Israel has had to continually defend it's very existence surrounded as it is by so many huge Arab countries who would prefer it not to be there.It does not use the Christian church or western media to draw up untold sympathy for itself.The western media is very biased against Israel & frequently distorts the truth about events there.There are many in the Christian church who do not support Israel & believe God has no further use for the Jews.But there are many Christians like myself who recognise from our reading of the Bible that God gave the original land of Canaan to Abraham & his descendants through Isaac & Jacob (whose name He changed to Israel) & the original Divine plan was a much larger area than the sliver that is modern day Israel.We stand on the unchanging truth of what Adonai said about Israel as that never changes.Many times the Jews have been dispersed from the their land but God always brings them back & continues to fulfill His purpose for them.
i find it disgusting that
i find it disgusting that whenever Israel is critiscised for anything, it is called "bashing" and bias. if the UN was really biased against the israel then there should be sanctions on israel imposed by the UN. we all know that israel has ignored more UN resolutions than all other nations combined. We are very aware of the arab/islamic extremist fundamentalism. however this is equally matched by the israeli extremist fundamentalism. the only difference is that this extremism is used from the pulpit of the WWII allies who constantly feel guilty for the war crimes of Germany. but let there be no mistake that israeli atrocities carried out since WWII continually make a mockery of the holocaust, and insult those who died in it. lets take the issue of nuclear armament. Has israel EVER has any IEAE inspections? what is the position of israeli nuclear arms? do they or do they not have them? as long as the unfair western bias towards israel prevails, hiding the state of apartheid that exists in israel. I mean what other nation on earth lays claim to the nation based on a 'group' or race of people alone. a JEWISH STATE? but that is secondary to the untold suffereing that israel imposes on the palestinian people. using the christian church, and western media to draw up untold sympathy for israel, has been the state of israel's most powerful weapon in this evil propaganda against justice. no body rejects the right to israel's destiny, however the world cannot be coerced to participate in the unfair bias that israel enjoys from the western powers. certainly not the arab world. Israel wants its cake and wants to eat it at the same time. i felt that both Ahmejinadad AND netanyahu insulted the principles of the UN by speeches. i bet, the readers of this comment of mine will now want to label me "anti-semitic" ! thats another foolish attempt to silence those who stand for truth regardless of race or religion. have a good day, and stand for truth not racist, xenophobic, ideology which has and will continue to plague the world and lead it to further destruction. two extremes do not make a right.